Arizona County Attorney Files Federal Lawsuit to End Race-Based DUI Courts
Cites
Statistics Showing Defendants Are Treated More Harshly in Non-Race-Based
Courts
PHOENIX
- Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas on Tuesday announced he
has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Phoenix to end Maricopa
Countys separate DUI courts for Spanish-speaking and Native
American DUI felons. His office also released a study which found
evidence of discrimination in sentencing: Offenders in General DUI
Court receive more than twice the average jail sentence that offenders
receive in Hispanic DUI Court.
Maricopa
Countys race-based courts are unconstitutional and must be
ended, Thomas said. Our criminal justice system must
be color-blind. I am obliged by my oath of office to challenge them
through all lawful means until this day comes.
Thomas
said that months of negotiations with the Superior Court and their
legal counsel have not resulted in progress toward disbandment of
the courts. As a result, he concluded he had no choice but to file
suit in federal court. Michael Carvin of the law firm of Jones Day
in Washington, D.C. will serve as lead counsel for the County Attorneys
Office.
The
lawsuit alleges that the special DUI courts established by the Maricopa
County Superior Courts violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the First Amendment,
and related federal statutes.
The
County Attorneys Office also released the results of its study
into the sentencing practices for defendants of the DUI courts.
The study, conducted by Chief Assistant County Attorney Sally Wells,
found that the average jail sanction in General DUI Court was more
than twice the average jail sanction in Hispanic DUI Court. The
average penalty in General DUI Court was 7 jail days, while the
average penalty in Hispanic DUI Court was 3 jail days.
Thomas
labeled this discrimination in its starkest form, noting
that such disparate treatment, far from promoting public safety,
as court administrators have
|