Can
You Be an Accomplice to DUI?
Information
courtesy of Lawrence Taylor - DUIblog
Is
it possible to be an accomplice to drunk driving -- that is, to
be convicted of "aiding and abetting" a person who was
driving under the influence of alcohol?
In
one case in Maine, two men were drinking together in a bar. When
they left, the owner of the car had his friend drive since the friend
was less intoxicated. The two were stopped by the police, and the
owner/passenger was taken to a police station -- where he refused
to take a breath test because he said he had not been driving. He
was subsequently charged with operating or attempting to operate
a motor vehicle under the influence. At trial, the jury found him
guilty as both a principal and an accomplice.
On
appeal, the court held that the accomplice statute applied to drunk
driving offenses, and that the evidence was sufficient for a jury
to find both the intent and the solicitation necessary for accomplice
liability. The defendant, said the court, had the specific intent
to enlist his accomplice/friend in driving under the influence.
State v. Stratton, 591 A.2d 246 (Me. 1991).
How
far can this go? Can you be guilty of letting a friend drive while
intoxicated? The majority rule in American courts today is that
any passenger, including the owner, can be held criminally liable
as an aider/abettor in the commission of the offense of DUI. Nor
is there any requirement that the accomplice be a passenger or owner
of the vehicle. In Guzman v. State, 586 S.E.2d 59 (Ga. App. 2003),
for example, the defendant was convicted of two counts of vehicular
homicide when he allowed a 14-year-old to drive his bother and a
friend in Guzman's vehicle after having given beer to the boys.
Mr. Guzman's criminal intent was inferred by his conduct in giving
the driver alcohol and the car keys, then standing silently by as
the 14-year-old got behind the wheel and drive away.
Query:
Assuming the validity of an accomplice theory, could not the accomplice's
own intoxication negate the specific intent required to be an accomplice?
|