Driving
Under the Influence of...Gasoline?
Information
courtesy of Lawrence Taylor - DUIblog
Folks
who have read my recent post, "Why Breathalyzers Dont
Measure Alcohol", seem quite surprised to find out these DUI
machines are not as reliable as MADD and law enforcement agencies
would have us believe. In fact, the manufacturers of these things
refuse to even warrant them to do what theyre supposed to:
accurately measure blood-alcohol levels (see my earlier post, "Breathalyzers:
Why Arent They Warranted to Measure Alcohol?")
So
how reliable are these "breathalyzers" that determine
a persons guilt or innocence in DUI cases? And just what DO
they measure?
Well,
thousands of different chemical compounds, according to scientists.
Gasoline for one. Consider an article appearing on the front page
of the Spokane Spokesman-Review (August 24, 1988), in which a person
sitting in jail awaiting trial for DUI claimed that he had nothing
to drink. He said he had run out of gas and had been siphoning gasoline
from a container into his tank before being stopped by the officer
and arrested. In siphoning, he had sucked on the hose to get it
started and accidentally swallowed a small amount of the gasoline.
He claimed that this must have caused the later high breathalyzer
reading.
The
individual finally talked the sheriff into a demonstration to prove
his story. Taken from his cell after one week of incarceration,
he swallowed a cup of unleaded gasoline and then blew into the breath
machine -- in this case, an "Intoximeter 3000".
The
results? After 5 minutes, the reading was .00%.....after 10 minutes,
.04%......after 20 minutes, the Intoximeter registered .31%.....and
after one hour, the reading was .28%. Even after three hours, the
person still blew a .24% on the machine -- three times the legal
limit! (A quick call from the sheriff to a local gasoline distributor
confirmed that gasoline contains no alcohol.)
This
was not a freak occurrence. The results have been scientifically
verified in a study conducted by CMI, Inc.,
|