Despite
numerous requests from my office and a pledge from the Superior
Court's attorneys to provide proof of these claims, the courts
have offered no supporting evidence.
The
County Attorney's Office has conducted a preliminary review of
the available data and found no evidence to support this claim.
We could find no appreciable difference in recidivism rates (2.6
percent of general DUI court defendants committing new felonies
vs. 2.5 percent of Spanish DUI court defendants).
Even
more troubling, we learned that the average jail sanction given
defendants in the general DUI court was more than twice the average
jail sanction given defendants in Hispanic DUI court (seven days
vs. three days). This is discrimination in its starkest form.
Such
disparate treatment also shows that race-based courts, far from
promoting public safety, endanger the public by offering lighter
penalties to selected defendants.
The
argument that race-based courts are necessary for "public
safety" is not only factually dubious but morally repugnant.
It boils down to the contention that racial discrimination in
sentencing is necessary to reduce the crime rate. Consider the
implications.
If
I assigned prosecutors in the County Attorney's Office to bureaus
based on their race or nationality (in an effort to "improve
their productivity" or similarly absurd reasons), or advocated
disparate punishment for defendants based on their race or nationality,
the uproar would be deafening.
Maricopa
County's presiding judge also has admitted she would consider
creating new courts for other races or groups if she concluded
this would benefit society. Are we to balkanize our nation to
the point that every race, nationality or religious group can
demand their own court? And if not, how do we deny these requests
now that some separate courts have been established?
It's
fascinating to observe the mental gymnastics required for people
to justify separate-but-equal courts. I cannot, however, indulge
in the same pastime.
When
I took office, I took an oath to uphold the Constitution. I will
not violate this oath even when means I must do things that are
unpopular or contrary to the wishes of vocal special interests.
Justice
must always be color-blind. This is a principle which cannot be
undermined and which I, for one, am willing to defend.
The
writer is Maricopa County Attorney.