Measuring
the Invisible Breath Sample
Information
courtesy of Lawrence Taylor - DUIblog
Many
of my recent posts have been about the incaccuracy of breath machines
used in DUI cases. But just how accurate do they have to be? Whats
so special about measuring some alcohol?
Well,
consider the amazingly tiny amount of alcohol these small machines
are trying to measure, and the need for extreme precision becomes
apparent -- a precision which cannot be found in these portable,
relatively inexpensive police-operated devices....
Lets
assume that a breathalyzer reading is .10%. This means that the
suspects blood contained .10 grams of alcohol in 100 milliliters
(cubic centimeters) of blood, or .001 grams per cubic centimeter
of blood. A typical breath machine such as an Intoxilyzer 5000 captures
50 cubic centimeters of the suspects blood. Applying Henrys
Law, this means that the equivalent of 1/40th of a cubic centimeter
of blood is represented by this breath sample. Since a cubic centimeter
contains 20 drops, we can say that 1/40th of a cubic centimeter
contains half a drop.
Assuming
a .10% reading, then, the machine is attempting to measure five
one-hundredths of one percent of a drop of alcohol -- an amount
invisible to the naked eye!
To
express this graphically, imagine a 55-gallon drum filled with water.
This represents about the same capacity as 210 liters of breath
-- the volume used by law in determining breath-blood analysis.
Then imagine taking an eyedropper with only one-tenth of a gram
of alcohol in it, and adding this tiny amount into the drum. Now
imagine trying to measure the amount of alcohol in the 55-gallon
drum.
Now
try it with a small, relatively cheap, portable machine maintained,
calibrated and operated by police officers.....a machine that is
not even warranted by its manufacturer to measure alcohol (see "Breathalyzers:
Why Aren't They Warranted to Measure Alcohol?").
The
government calls this "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".
|