Lawyers
lose in fight over
DUI trials
Michael
Kiefer
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 23, 2006 12:00 AM
The
presiding criminal judge of Maricopa County Superior Court on Wednesday
struck down a challenge by a group of public defenders hoping to
disqualify the County Attorney's Office from trying the cases of
25 Hispanic and Native American DUI defendants.
The
attorneys maintained that there was a conflict of interest between
the court and County Attorney's Office because of a federal lawsuit
brought against the court by County Attorney Andrew Thomas over
the constitutionality of the court's Spanish-language and Native
American DUI probation programs.
Judge
James Keppel ruled that there was no conflict.
"For
the same reason that the court is not required to recuse itself
from these criminal prosecutions, the county attorney may continue
to represent the state and appear before any of the judges of this
court," he wrote.
In
a court hearing on the matter Tuesday, attorneys for both sides
promised to appeal Keppel's decision if they lost.
Attorney
Edward Conter, speaking on behalf of the other public defenders
who filed the motion to disqualify the county attorney, said that
they would consider the needs of the individual defendants before
bringing a special action to the Court of Appeals.
Keppel
also denied the attorneys' request to put the defendants' cases
on hold pending any Appeals Court decision.
Thomas
filed suit in federal court on Feb. 28, claiming that special probation
programs for Spanish-speaking and Native Americans were "race-based"
and unconstitutional. He further alleged that the probation violators
among the Spanish speakers were punished less harshly than DUI defendants
in the general population.
|